[Kgs-contact] {GM=194}...Is this your email address: kgs-contact at simtk.org ?

'' Zhang Cheng '' ztbjcggsjw at sina.com
Sat Mar 16 05:46:48 PDT 2024


Spam detection software, running on the system "simtk-server.stanford.edu",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.

Content preview:  14th of March, 2024. Good-day to you, My name is Zhang Cheng
   (Mr.) a wealth manager with an investment house; i am sending you this email
   to your email address: kgs-contact at simtk.org , as i had previously sent you
   a letter by post to your [...] 

Content analysis details:   (23.8 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                            blocked.  See
                            http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                             for more information.
                            [URIs: simtk.org]
 0.0 HK_SCAM_N2             BODY: No description available.
 0.5 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL     From: localpart has series of non-vowel
                            letters
 0.0 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM      Envelope sender username looks random
 1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                            bl.spamcop.net
            [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?194.169.175.140>]
 0.1 RCVD_IN_SBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL
                            [194.169.175.140 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
 3.3 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                            [194.169.175.140 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                            [194.169.175.140 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
                            https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
                          [194.169.175.140 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_FAIL          SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo;id=sina.com;ip=194.169.175.140;r=simtk-server.stanford.edu]
 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in
                            digit (zhangcheng45[at]sina.com)
 0.0 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=ztbjcggsjw%40sina.com;ip=194.169.175.140;r=simtk-server.stanford.edu]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                            provider (ztbjcggsjw[at]sina.com)
 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.5000]
 0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL      Mailspike blacklisted
 0.2 FREEMAIL_DISPTO        Disposition-Notification-To/From or
                            Disposition-Notification-To/body contain
                            different freemails
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_ZBI     No description available.
 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO       Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain
                            different freemails
 1.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML To: lacks brackets and no rDNS and HTML
                            only
 1.0 SPOOFED_FREEM_REPTO_CHN Forged freemail sender with Chinese
                            freemail reply-to
 2.5 SPOOFED_FREEM_REPTO    Forged freemail sender with freemail
                            reply-to
 2.4 ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW      Appears to be advance fee fraud (Nigerian 419)

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: '' Zhang Cheng '' <ztbjcggsjw at sina.com>
Subject: {GM=194}...Is this your email address: kgs-contact at simtk.org ?
Date: 16 Mar 2024 05:46:48 -0700
Size: 1883
URL: <https://simtk.org/pipermail/kgs-contact/attachments/20240316/6ad828ea/attachment.mht>


More information about the Kgs-contact mailing list