[Population Modeling] Our paper for SpringSim returned from review - we need to act

[Samarth Swarup]

I agree.

Samarth

On 2/19/15 4:12 PM, Aaron Garrett wrote:
> I have no objection to any of those approaches. If pressed for a 
> single choice, I would choose option #1.
>
> Aaron Garrett
>
> On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 2:10:02 PM Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jacob.barhak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi All, yet especially our SpringSim paper authors,
>
>     Those of you that joined the group before 9-Jan may recall that we
>     took the correspondence in this group and formed it into a paper
>     that was submitted to SpringSim. Here is the paper draft submitted:
>
>     https://simtk.org/docman/view.php/962/1886/PopModExample_Submit_2015_01_09.doc
>
>     To be clear, if you introduced yourself to the group and
>     sent references before 9-Jan and unless you specified otherwise
>     you are an author in the paper.
>
>     The Work in Progress (WIP) editor Gregory Zacharewicz has
>     responded to our submission. Here are his comments:
>
>     ###### Relevant Response Text #######
>
>     On behalf of the SpringWIP 2015 WIP Program Committee, your paper
>     seems promising and can have the potential to appear as Work in
>     Progress at the conference:
>
>          Population Modeling by Examples
>
>     Nevertheless it does not respect some of the following format
>     constraints:
>
>     1. Title must have the mention "(WIP)"
>     2. Check the paper format according to the author kit
>     http://www.scs.org/documents/2014%20New%20Author%20Kit.zip
>     3. Respect the 6 pages limitation
>
>     ###### End of relevant Response Text #######
>
>     Here are 3 possible actions we can take as a group:
>
>     1. Shorten text of each contributor to be of limited size. This
>     seems the default solution and I can take care of it with your
>     permission.
>
>     2. Transfer the last few contributors to a new paper that will be
>     submitted to SummerSim with new contributions collected after
>     January 9th. We can quickly assemble such a paper to include our
>     new members - we grew by 50% since then.
>
>     3. Decide on another publication venue that will allow a longer
>     paper, i.e. journal, conference, book, web site, etc. - If you
>     have ideas, please suggest.
>
>     At this point, I would like to know what the group thinks. I would
>     ask paper contributors to briefly respond to the list before
>     Monday February 22.
>
>     Also, if you plan to attend SpringSim in April in Virginia please
>     let me know. I would appreciate help in presentation.
>
>                  Jacob
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     PopModWkGrpIMAG-news mailing list
>     PopModWkGrpIMAG-news at simtk.org <mailto:PopModWkGrpIMAG-news at simtk.org>
>     https://simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/popmodwkgrpimag-news
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PopModWkGrpIMAG-news mailing list
> PopModWkGrpIMAG-news at simtk.org
> https://simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/popmodwkgrpimag-news

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://simtk.org/pipermail/popmodwkgrpimag-news/attachments/20150219/8eb5f3a7/attachment.html