[Vp-integration-subgroup] [EXT] Re: [Vp-reproduce-subgroup] White paper submission - vote for venue

[James Osborne]

Agreed

I also think there needs to be an effort to make it more readable and
consistent throughout and from experience this can only happen by a small
group taking it on.

James

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:38 PM Eric Forgoston <
eric.forgoston at montclair.edu> wrote:

> * External email: Please exercise caution *
> ------------------------------
> Dear all,
>
> It is probably worth having a zoom chat to discuss the revision so that we
> are all working in concert.  In particular, John Gennari sent an email last
> week on May 3 with some thoughts that are well-worth discussing.
>
> Is there interest in doing this?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eric
> ---------------------
> Dr. Eric Forgoston
> Professor of Applied Mathematics
> Chair, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics
> Montclair State University
> Montclair, NJ  07043 USA
> +1 973 655-7242
> https://eric-forgoston.github.io/
>
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings white paper contributors,
>>
>> The voting period is over and the vote did not change, so it is now time
>> to act.
>>
>> The paper will be revised as requested by 10 voters and the target
>> journal will be Bioinformatics - James Glazier and Yaling Liu will share
>> publication costs.
>>
>> All those who asked to revise are requested to make the revisions and
>> discuss those.
>>
>> I ask to reach a revised version by May 25 so that we can finish an
>> approval round by June 1st.
>>
>> So far only Sheriff provided suggestions for revisions prior to
>> submission so I suggest we start discussing those:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ag4ipuybjtthxgV0YjXqYP7AwwNSYcWh/edit
>>
>> However, since it is out of format and out of date, I suggest that all
>> those who want to make changes login and request to access the main
>> document and introduce changes there:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IMEgmdNkx-EsnOjGuegpenSIMmKIkK00Lc8Gred3QxM/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> I do ask that this will not be delayed any further and those who asked
>> for changes give this task priority so it can be completed in time.
>>
>> I look forward to your contributions.
>>
>>             Jacob
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 4:25 PM Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings white paper contributors,
>>>
>>> Allow me to remind you that the Voting and vote changes are still
>>> possible until 11-May 1am CDT
>>>
>>> The current votes I saw are:
>>>
>>> 10 votes for revision
>>> Jonathan Karr
>>> Eric Forgoston
>>> William Waites
>>> James Glazier  - RS Interface or Bioinformatics
>>> Rahuman Sheriff
>>> Yaling Liu - Bioinformatics
>>> John Rice
>>> Winston Garira
>>> Gilberto Gonzalez-Parra
>>> James Osborne
>>>
>>> It seems 2 people supported Bioinformatics - James Glazier and Yaling
>>> Liu  so if this vote is accepted, they will split publication costs and the
>>> terget venue for revisions will be Bioinformatics.
>>>
>>> There is currently 1 minority vote:
>>> Jacob Barhak for direct submission to Nature -  Scientific Reports
>>>
>>> If revision is selected, time will be limited, so I suggest those who
>>> voted to start working on revisions.
>>>
>>> Hopefully this reminder will move us forward.
>>>
>>>             Jacob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 12:18 PM Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Greetings white paper contributors,
>>>>
>>>> It is time to vote again for the target venue. Here are the options
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>>    1. Cureus - resubmission after addressing editor comments
>>>>    2. Nature - if you vote for this venue please specify flavour such
>>>>    as Nature Scientific Reports
>>>>    3. Science
>>>>    4. Briefings in Bioinformatics
>>>>    5. Trends in Biotechnology - requires distilling the paper
>>>>    6. Journal of The Royal Society Interface
>>>>    7. Annual Review of Public Health
>>>>    8. BMJ
>>>>    9. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
>>>>    10. F1000research - if you vote for this this venue please
>>>>    specify Gateway / Collection
>>>>    11. bulletin of mathematical biology
>>>>    12. Bioinformatics.
>>>>    13. Do not submit now - instead open for revisions for 2 weeks and
>>>>    then submit. If you choose this option also vote for the target venue after
>>>>    revisions so that we will not have to delay further.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will ask that contributors pick one journal from that list - I ask
>>>> that you REPLY ALL so votes will be transparent and time of vote will be
>>>> registered since first to vote will break ties.
>>>>
>>>> The voting period will be until Tuesday 11-May 1am CDT
>>>>
>>>> Again, if a journal costs for open publication, whoever voted, will
>>>> split publication costs. If anyone on this list is funded for this, please
>>>> vote.
>>>>
>>>> I urge contributors to vote - just so that we will have a preference
>>>> order to follow in case of rejection.
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to your votes.
>>>>
>>>>             Jacob
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Vp-reproduce-subgroup mailing list
>> Vp-reproduce-subgroup at lists.simtk.org
>> https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-reproduce-subgroup
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.simtk.org/pipermail/vp-integration-subgroup/attachments/20210512/be90c67c/attachment-0001.html>