[Vp-integration-subgroup] [Vp-reproduce-subgroup] White paper revision
John Gennari
gennari at uw.edu
Wed May 12 11:09:49 PDT 2021
This is definitely a good idea. The challenge might be to schedule a
time when a sufficient quorum of us are available....
My plan over the rest of this week is to draft up a significant
re-working of the paper, and then distribute that to all. This won't be
a complete revision, but rather some example of the kinds of things to
say, and some outlines of the proposed re-organization. I should have
this done by Friday, or this weekend at the latest. So then a Zoom call
next week (Monday, May 17?) might make sense to talk thru the ideas that
I send out by this Friday.
-John G.
On 5/11/2021 7:37 PM, Eric Forgoston wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It is probably worth having a zoom chat to discuss the revision
> so that we are all working in concert. In particular, John Gennari
> sent an email last week on May 3 with some thoughts that are
> well-worth discussing.
>
> Is there interest in doing this?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eric
> ---------------------
> Dr. Eric Forgoston
> Professor of Applied Mathematics
> Chair, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics
> Montclair State University
> Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
> +1 973 655-7242
> https://eric-forgoston.github.io/ <https://eric-forgoston.github.io/>
>
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com
> <mailto:jacob.barhak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Greetings white paper contributors,
>
> The voting period is over and the vote did not change, so it is
> now time to act.
>
> The paper will be revised as requested by 10 voters and the target
> journal will be Bioinformatics - James Glazier and Yaling Liu will
> share publication costs.
>
> All those who asked to revise are requested to make the revisions
> and discuss those.
>
> I ask to reach a revised version by May 25 so that we can finish
> an approval round by June 1st.
>
> So far only Sheriff provided suggestions for revisions prior to
> submission so I suggest we start discussing those:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ag4ipuybjtthxgV0YjXqYP7AwwNSYcWh/edit
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ag4ipuybjtthxgV0YjXqYP7AwwNSYcWh/edit>
>
> However, since it is out of format and out of date, I suggest that
> all those who want to make changes login and request to access the
> main document and introduce changes there:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IMEgmdNkx-EsnOjGuegpenSIMmKIkK00Lc8Gred3QxM/edit?usp=sharing
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IMEgmdNkx-EsnOjGuegpenSIMmKIkK00Lc8Gred3QxM/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> I do ask that this will not be delayed any further and those who
> asked for changes give this task priority so it can be completed
> in time.
>
> I look forward to your contributions.
>
> Jacob
>
>
> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 4:25 PM Jacob Barhak
> <jacob.barhak at gmail.com <mailto:jacob.barhak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Greetings white paper contributors,
>
> Allow me to remind you that the Voting and vote changes are
> still possible until 11-May 1am CDT
>
> The current votes I saw are:
>
> 10 votes for revision
> Jonathan Karr
> Eric Forgoston
> William Waites
> James Glazier - RS Interface or Bioinformatics
> Rahuman Sheriff
> Yaling Liu - Bioinformatics
> John Rice
> Winston Garira
> Gilberto Gonzalez-Parra
> James Osborne
>
> It seems 2 people supported Bioinformatics - James Glazier and
> Yaling Liu so if this vote is accepted, they will split
> publication costs and the terget venue for revisions will be
> Bioinformatics.
>
> There is currently 1 minority vote:
> Jacob Barhak for direct submission to Nature - Scientific
> Reports
>
> If revision is selected, time will be limited, so I suggest
> those who voted to start working on revisions.
>
> Hopefully this reminder will move us forward.
>
> Jacob
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 12:18 PM Jacob Barhak
> <jacob.barhak at gmail.com <mailto:jacob.barhak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Greetings white paper contributors,
>
> It is time to vote again for the target venue. Here are
> the options again.
>
> 1. Cureus - resubmission after addressing editor comments
> 2. Nature - if you vote for this venue please specify
> flavour such as Nature Scientific Reports
> 3. Science
> 4. Briefings in Bioinformatics
> 5. Trends in Biotechnology - requires distilling the paper
> 6. Journal of The Royal Society Interface
> 7. Annual Review of Public Health
> 8. BMJ
> 9. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
> 10. F1000research - if you vote for this this venue please
> specify Gateway / Collection
> 11. bulletin of mathematical biology
> 12. Bioinformatics.
> 13. Do not submit now - instead open for revisions for 2
> weeks and then submit. If you choose this option also
> vote for the target venue after revisions so that we
> will not have to delay further.
>
>
> I will ask that contributors pick one journal from that
> list - I ask that you REPLY ALL so votes will be
> transparent and time of vote will be registered since
> first to vote will break ties.
>
> The voting period will be until Tuesday 11-May 1am CDT
>
> Again, if a journal costs for open publication, whoever
> voted, will split publication costs. If anyone on this
> list is funded for this, please vote.
>
> I urge contributors to vote - just so that we will have a
> preference order to follow in case of rejection.
>
> Looking forward to your votes.
>
> Jacob
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vp-reproduce-subgroup mailing list
> Vp-reproduce-subgroup at lists.simtk.org
> <mailto:Vp-reproduce-subgroup at lists.simtk.org>
> https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-reproduce-subgroup
> <https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-reproduce-subgroup>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.simtk.org/pipermail/vp-integration-subgroup/attachments/20210512/a6b631f5/attachment.html>
More information about the Vp-integration-subgroup
mailing list