<div dir="ltr">So Tomas,<div><br></div><div>Before starting editing, to save time it is important that we establish what is going to be edited - I voiced my concern over the large deletions in Johns version more than once - there is a real problem there - many authors may be completely eliminated in the name of style - I don't like it - so John has to decide how he spends his time - first just define what sections you want to contribute in - this will help John comprehend the magnitude of the task - he promised editorial services for two weeks - so before we start wasting time with edits, lets see the entire picture. </div><div><br></div><div>Tomas, what you like may be something I dislike or something I do not care about, and eventually we all have to agree - and there are about 20 of us - this is a legal requirement for copyright transfer. The task here is time consuming and I do not envy John and it is important we all help him realize the task before he spends time on it.</div><div><br></div><div>And please reply to all - there are some contributors that are listed in only one list and some that may not have signed up - they all need to be aware of what we are doing. </div><div><br></div><div>Hopefully you identified the sections you want to contribute to - please state those to move this forward quicker.</div><div><br></div><div>            Jacob</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:08 AM Tomas Helikar <<a href="mailto:thelikar2@unl.edu">thelikar2@unl.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">

  
  <div>
    <p>I suggest we use John's version - the flow has begun to improve
      there and he'll be bringing the content over from the submitted
      version.</p>
    <p>At the top of each of the other version, there should be big red
      "DO NOT EDIT THIS VERSION" and a link to John's version that will
      be the running draft where our efforts should focus.</p>
    <p>Best,<br>
    </p>
    <div>
      <div style="line-height:16px;margin:6px 0px;padding:8px;border-top:1px dotted rgb(174,177,166);border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(174,177,166);font-size:11px;color:grey">
        <font size="2.5px;" color="#0049FF">Tomas
          Helikar, Ph.D.</font> <br>
        Susan J. Rosowski Associate Professor <br>
        Department of Biochemistry | University of Nebraska-Lincoln <br>
        m: <a href="callto:402-547-8904" style="color:rgb(0,136,204)" target="_blank">402-547-8904</a> | o: <a href="callto:402-472-3530" style="color:rgb(0,136,204)" target="_blank">402-472-3530</a><br>
        <a href="http://www.postbox-inc.com" style="border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(170,170,170);color:rgb(0,136,204);text-decoration:none" target="_blank">www.helikarlab.org</a> | <a href="http://helikarlab.org" style="border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(170,170,170);color:rgb(0,136,204);text-decoration:none" target="_blank">cellcollective.org</a><br>
        twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/helikarlab" style="border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(170,170,170);color:rgb(0,136,204);text-decoration:none" target="_blank">@helikarlab</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/biocollective" style="border-bottom:1px dotted rgb(170,170,170);color:rgb(0,136,204);text-decoration:none" target="_blank">@biocollective</a>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div>On 5/18/21 9:05 AM, Jacob Barhak wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div>
        <font face="sans-serif" color="#FF6347">Non-NU Email</font>
        <hr>
      </div>
      <div dir="ltr">Yes Sheriff,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>You have a good point. Here are the versions of the paper
          that I recall. 
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>1. The version we all approved - I suggest we use this: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1IMEgmdNkx-2DEsnOjGuegpenSIMmKIkK00Lc8Gred3QxM_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=FanQUPp95Lqx2G9Ojb6SLVQzkZS6mrqBIt_W-zgW8_Q&e=" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IMEgmdNkx-EsnOjGuegpenSIMmKIkK00Lc8Gred3QxM/edit?usp=sharing</a></div>
          <div>2. John Gennari version: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1VvyP3YZQdQYjj8DFKOpQ4pn-5F0pdDGgiT_edit-3Fts-3D60a294c2&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=7h_7qlaNYzcnYViiFjrrVhBADdtnSQ8eh_Wg_vxmY4I&e=" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VvyP3YZQdQYjj8DFKOpQ4pn_0pdDGgiT/edit?ts=60a294c2</a></div>
          <div>3. Rahuman Sheriff version: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1Ag4ipuybjtthxgV0YjXqYP7AwwNSYcWh_edit&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=yaBZO6lyEXDKmMXfrDPDqy10sDgl0FQgkFFMO3_iShg&e=" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ag4ipuybjtthxgV0YjXqYP7AwwNSYcWh/edit</a></div>
          <div>4. Alexander Kulesza version <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__drive.google.com_file_d_1U-5FlTHrV6STXWNT3GiCepvsLk1WdYgzN5_view&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=6gQoAQCH7F2WOy92A0xjfWmCMUjW7onPku8BYcIsY9Y&e=" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U_lTHrV6STXWNT3GiCepvsLk1WdYgzN5/view</a></div>
          <div>5. Original Model Reproducibility, Credibility,
            Standardization subgroup version  <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1cqwXAjBWEiJZ1tUBnf66QVHdHd2fKq-5FW0py7t4PNVLo_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=QH6Rgy4why7ib2YGE2T5AA61L68xDE1K-ySoCdKV9ew&e=" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cqwXAjBWEiJZ1tUBnf66QVHdHd2fKq_W0py7t4PNVLo/edit?usp=sharing</a></div>
          <div>6. Original Integration subgroup  version:  <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1voUSrSpv3AZlC1T-2DBLa3W4wzHQ5vEdJCVrBbwMUTDiQ_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=WPFW1D-ECFULPKl8uijQsNA58J5V7TNynIc9OeqCiBE&e=" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voUSrSpv3AZlC1T-BLa3W4wzHQ5vEdJCVrBbwMUTDiQ/edit?usp=sharing</a></div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>The last two versions hold the original discussions
            before the merge to the version on top. The history of those
            contain most contributions - however it will take hours to
            figure out where each text portion is located in the new
            version. Yet the new version also includes many
            modifications. And I believe Hana has another version of
            proofs that were never made public - we did this revision
            and proof process before, yet I think she sent me her
            version privately. I may be mistaken - it was a long time
            ago. </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Hopefully this list will help understand the undertaking
            and save time.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>             Jacob</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:34
          AM Rahuman Sheriff <<a href="mailto:sheriff@ebi.ac.uk" target="_blank">sheriff@ebi.ac.uk</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div>Dear John G,
            <div>Many thanks for the update.</div>
            <div>I like the new ordering :)</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>@Jacob, as you mentioned you have 6 versions, could you
              please add the link to those versions in  John G document,
              so they are all inked.</div>
            <div>I give consent to to rephrase my contribution or even
              remove part or all of my contribution to the white paper
              and present the ideas in other sections if required to
              make the paper coherent and flow well.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>The white paper has a great collections of ideas, I
              hope we can get it into a  good shape soon for submission
              and benefit the scientific community.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Best regards</div>
            <div>Sheriff</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div>On 18 May 2021, at 13:28, James Osborne <<a href="mailto:jmosborne@unimelb.edu.au" target="_blank">jmosborne@unimelb.edu.au</a>>
                  wrote:</div>
                <br>
                <div>
                  <div dir="ltr">Sorry I wasn't on the call Yesterday
                    (it was 1 am for me so not really achievable).
                    Looking at the emails looks like it was useful. 
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Happy to help how I can, in terms of areas as
                      someone on the multicellular side of life i'm
                      probably most use on 3 but happy to support
                      others.</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>James </div>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">
                    <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, May 18,
                      2021 at 3:12 PM John Gennari <<a href="mailto:gennari@uw.edu" target="_blank">gennari@uw.edu</a>>
                      wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <div style="font-size:12px;text-align:left;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"><strong>
                              <table style="width:100%;float:left" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
                                <tbody>
                                  <tr>
                                    <td style="color:red"><b>External
                                        email: </b>Please exercise
                                      caution</td>
                                  </tr>
                                </tbody>
                              </table>
                            </strong><br>
                          </div>
                          <hr>
                        </div>
                        <p><br>
                        </p>
                        <p>All: About 9 of us had a lively Zoom meeting
                          today to chat about the manuscript. By the
                          end, it was a productive meeting, and I'm
                          hoping that this email will capture some key
                          outputs from the meeting. I apologize if I
                          said some things that were a bit
                          "inflammatory". Obviously 2 years would be
                          much too long to get this paper out-the door.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>I saw two outcomes. First, we had some nice
                          ideas and discussion about re-ordering
                          (initiated by Tomas Helikar). In the below,
                          I'm going to propose one possible ordering,
                          but this is certainly a work-in-progress. The
                          reason that I think ordering is important is
                          that it will give us a much better ability to
                          write a strong concluding section, where we
                          talk about themes and the larger arc of our
                          ideas.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>Second, we agreed that we should nominate
                          "point persons" who would be in charge of at
                          least the initial cut of each of the
                          subsections. As Jacob pointed out, this
                          information should be easy to get from older
                          email and history of the development of the
                          paper. During the zoom meeting, we associated
                          some co-authors with some sections, but our
                          coverage wasn't perfect (see challenge #12).
                          Hopefully people will "stand up" and admit
                          that some section of text is theirs.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>So in the below, I include the original title
                          of the section, a few words about the content
                          of that section, and then a name (or several
                          names) of co-authors who will be the "point
                          person" to make sure that the appropriate
                          content is included. Obviously, all co-authors
                          can and should chime in on any part of the
                          text, but the point person should make sure
                          that the key ideas are included.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>The basic ordering idea for the dozen
                          challenges was to follow the life-cycle of
                          model development, execution, sharing and
                          integration, and eventually implementation.
                          So...
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>*********************************************<br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>(1) "</b><b>Data</b><b> and measurement
                            definitions</b>". Before you can build a
                          model, you must have data. So data
                          availability and measurement standards is the
                          place to start.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>People: </b>Hana D, Jacob B<br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>(2) "</b><b>The variety of modeling
                            languages</b>" This is about the choice of
                          modeling languages, such as using SBML,
                          CellML, or Matlab. As I said on the phone
                          call, this is sort of about "syntax"--how do
                          you write down your model?
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>People:</b> John G, Jon K, Rahuman S.</p>
                        <p><b>(3) "</b><b>The variety of modeling
                            paradigms and scales"</b><b> </b>Separately
                          from modeling syntax, we must acknowledge
                          modeling paradigms with very different
                          semantics. Some clear examples are PDEs versus
                          ODEs versus rule-based systems (and obviously
                          one can combine these). Certainly semantics
                          might impact syntax (the prior challenge), in
                          that certain modeling language might be
                          appropriate only for some paradigms.</p>
                        <p>People: James G, Eric F (?) <br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>(4) "</b><b>Units standardization</b>" A
                          common reason that models are not reproducible
                          are errors in units, or misunderstanding about
                          units, or simply a lack of information about
                          units.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>People: Jacob B, Hana D</p>
                        <p><b>(5) "</b><b>A lack of annotations in
                            models</b>". Once researchers publish
                          models, they must annotate the model so that
                          others can understand it. Quality annotation
                          is essential for both search and
                          reproducibility.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>People: John G.</p>
                        <p><b>(6) "</b><b>Models are hard to locate"</b>
                          If your goal is to reproduce, understand and
                          possibly reuse or integrate some other model,
                          one must first find that model. This requires
                          annotation (prior section) and repositories
                          (Physiome Model Repository, BioModels) and
                          search platforms (ModeleXchange). <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>People: Jon K, John G.</p>
                        <p><b>(7) "</b><b>Common platforms to execute
                            models" </b>A model is pretty worthless as
                          a static object. For folk to understand and
                          reproduce models they must be executable.
                          Alas, there is no single or consistent way of
                          executing a model -- and of course, this
                          interacts direction with section #2 and #3,
                          above: Execution platforms are usually only
                          for one modeling paradigm, and often for one
                          modeling language. The BioSimulators work goes
                          here.</p>
                        <p>People: Jon K. <br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>(8) "</b><b>Credibility </b><b>and
                            validity of models</b>" Once a model is
                          published, how do folk know it is right? Model
                          validation is a big topic and challenge.
                          Credibility follows (in part) from validation,
                          but also requires transparency and
                          reproducibility, etc. <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>People: John Rice, Jon K, Jacob B</p>
                        <p><b>(9) "</b><b>Environments to adapt and
                            integrate models</b>" As I see it, one of
                          the end-targets for this manuscript is to
                          better enable model integration, to build
                          better models. There are many challenges with
                          the task of integrating two (or more) models.
                          (One that has recently been discussed is that
                          even if model A and model B are valid and
                          correct, there is no guarantee that the
                          combined model A+B is correct. I liked what
                          William Waites and Katherine Morse posted on
                          this subject.) This section is where SBML-comp
                          and SemGen environments can be mentioned.</p>
                        <p>People: John G.</p>
                        <p>(<b>10) "Challenges for stochastic models" </b>Special
                          challenges specific to stochaistic modeling.
                          An obvious point to mention is repeatability
                          -- stochastic models don't necessarily give
                          the same results with the same inputs.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>People: James G., Eric F<br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>(11) "Licensing barriers" </b>Issues
                          around "open source" and CC0 licensing.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p>People: Jacob B<br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>(12) "Barriers to model implementations
                            and applications"</b>  (I might suggest this
                          be re-phrased for better clarity). What this
                          section should discuss are challenges is
                          getting a community to actually use models for
                          "real-world" applications or decision making.
                          This is more of a cultural/societal challenge,
                          and thus seems like a nice big-picture way to
                          end.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p><b>People: ?? </b>I don't have any names
                          here...<br>
                        </p>
                        <p>*********************************************</p>
                        <p>We didn't really talk much about it in the
                          Zoom meeting, but there have been ideas tossed
                          around about a "baker's dozen", i.e., adding a
                          13th challenge. We could also potentially
                          merge some of the above.
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p class="MsoNormal">The "point persons" listed
                          above is obviously a subset of co-authors.
                          That's fine and appropriate. Just for
                          transparency, I follow what I think is pretty
                          standard policy for authorship issues, and
                          nicely summarized by the<span style="font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif">
                            International Committee of Medical Journal
                            Editors (ICMJE); see 2019 updated document
                            at
                          </span><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icmje.org_icmje-2Drecommendations.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=l29d3A9PItAUv4N0WkCuREqes9tSKSW7sk5GDEo6VBA&e=" target="_blank">http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf</a> 
                          (Or see, below my signature, a summary of the
                          key points of this document).
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <p class="MsoNormal">Finally, I've made the
                          document editable by all at <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1VvyP3YZQdQYjj8DFKOpQ4pn-5F0pdDGgiT_edit-3Fts-3D60a294c2&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=7h_7qlaNYzcnYViiFjrrVhBADdtnSQ8eh_Wg_vxmY4I&e=" target="_blank">
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VvyP3YZQdQYjj8DFKOpQ4pn_0pdDGgiT/edit?ts=60a294c2</a>
                          <br>
                          <span style="font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif"></span></p>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <p>-John G.<br>
==========================================================================<br>
                          Associate Professor & Graduate Program
                          Director      <a href="mailto:gennari@uw.edu" target="_blank">
                            <gennari@uw.edu></a><br>
                          Dep't of Biomedical Informatics
                          and                  telephone:206-616-6641<br>
                              Medical Education, box
                          358047                 <br>
                          University of Washington<br>
                          Seattle, WA  98109-4714             <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__faculty.washington.edu_gennari_&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=7h8T10a2oOTChEmXp5dGxDnAIghmjMroKsXSfcbIH9Y&e=" target="_blank">
                            http://faculty.washington.edu/gennari/</a><br>
==========================================================================<br>
                          <br>
                        </p>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.25in"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif">The
                            ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on
                            the following 4 criteria:
                          </span></p>
                        <p style="margin-left:0.75in">
                          <span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif"><span>1.<span>     
                              </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif">Substantial
                            contributions to the conception or design of
                            the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or
                            interpretation of data for the work; AND</span></p>
                        <p style="margin-left:0.75in">
                          <span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif"><span>2.<span>     
                              </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif">Drafting
                            the work or revising it critically for
                            important intellectual content; AND
                          </span></p>
                        <p style="margin-left:0.75in">
                          <span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif"><span>3.<span>     
                              </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif">Final
                            approval of the version to be published; AND
                          </span></p>
                        <p style="margin-left:0.75in">
                          <span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif"><span>4.<span>     
                              </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif">Agreement
                            to be accountable for all aspects of the
                            work in ensuring that questions related to
                            the accuracy or integrity of any part of the
                            work are appropriately investigated and
                            resolved.</span></p>
                        <p style="margin-left:0.75in">
                          <span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
                          </span></p>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <p><br>
                        </p>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  Vp-integration-subgroup mailing list<br>
                  <a href="mailto:Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org" target="_blank">Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org</a><br>
                  <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.simtk.org_mailman_listinfo_vp-2Dintegration-2Dsubgroup&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=T4L8FQANWyunSNQfPEYgCGjRs1jezmcAMA__mVoEmB4&e=" target="_blank">https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-integration-subgroup</a><br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Vp-integration-subgroup mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org" target="_blank">Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org</a><br>
          <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.simtk.org_mailman_listinfo_vp-2Dintegration-2Dsubgroup&d=DwMFaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=T4L8FQANWyunSNQfPEYgCGjRs1jezmcAMA__mVoEmB4&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-integration-subgroup</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
Vp-integration-subgroup mailing list
<a href="mailto:Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org" target="_blank">Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org</a>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.simtk.org_mailman_listinfo_vp-2Dintegration-2Dsubgroup&d=DwIGaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=T4L8FQANWyunSNQfPEYgCGjRs1jezmcAMA__mVoEmB4&e=" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.simtk.org_mailman_listinfo_vp-2Dintegration-2Dsubgroup&d=DwIGaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=ct8WBL42ANwALp5sfmoKGqugGgF8k0-4cJjYaO-gSGg&m=YDnTfj5kBWpXRZrktQP7smDeXePfRkoZxmwhpBzEh8c&s=T4L8FQANWyunSNQfPEYgCGjRs1jezmcAMA__mVoEmB4&e=</a> 
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Vp-integration-subgroup mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org" target="_blank">Vp-integration-subgroup@lists.simtk.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-integration-subgroup" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-integration-subgroup</a><br>
</blockquote></div>