[Population Modeling] Our paper for SpringSim returned from review - we need to act

[Talitha Feenstra]

 Agree, option 1 seems best and we can shorten our own part.

regards, Talitha

TL Feenstra

-----popmodwkgrpimag-news-bounces at simtk.org schreef: -----
Aan: Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com>, "popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org" <popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org>
Van: Jonathan Karnon 
Verzonden door: popmodwkgrpimag-news-bounces at simtk.org
Datum: 02/19/2015 11:18PM
Onderwerp: Re: [Population Modeling] Our paper for SpringSim returned from	review - we need to act

     
 
 
Hi Jacob   

  
Option 1 is good – you could set a word limit for each contributor and ask us to edit our section 

  
Regards 

  
Jon 

   
 From: Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com>
 Date: Friday, 20 February 2015 6:40 am
 To: "popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org" <popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org>
 Subject: [Population Modeling] Our paper for SpringSim returned from review - we need to act
  

  
 
 
 
Hi All, yet especially our SpringSim paper authors, 

  
Those of you that joined the group before 9-Jan may recall that we took the correspondence in this group and formed it into a paper that was submitted to SpringSim. Here is the paper draft submitted: 

  
https://simtk.org/docman/view.php/962/1886/PopModExample_Submit_2015_01_09.doc 

  
To be clear, if you introduced yourself to the group and sent references before 9-Jan and unless you specified otherwise you are an author in the paper. 

  
The Work in Progress (WIP) editor Gregory Zacharewicz has responded to our submission. Here are his comments: 

  
###### Relevant Response Text ####### 

  
On behalf of the SpringWIP 2015 WIP Program Committee, your paper seems promising and can have the potential to appear as Work in Progress at the conference:
 
      Population Modeling by Examples
 
 Nevertheless it does not respect some of the following format constraints:
 
 1. Title must have the mention "(WIP)"
 2. Check the paper format according to the author kit
    http://www.scs.org/documents/2014%20New%20Author%20Kit.zip
 3. Respect the 6 pages limitation
  

  
 
###### End of relevant Response Text #######  

  
Here are 3 possible actions we can take as a group: 

  
1. Shorten text of each contributor to be of limited size. This seems the default solution and I can take care of it with your permission. 

  
2. Transfer the last few contributors to a new paper that will be submitted to SummerSim with new contributions collected after January 9th. We can quickly assemble such a paper to include our new members - we grew by 50% since then. 

  
3. Decide on another publication venue that will allow a longer paper, i.e. journal, conference, book, web site, etc. - If you have ideas, please suggest. 

  
At this point, I would like to know what the group thinks. I would ask paper contributors to briefly respond to the list before Monday February 22.  

  
Also, if you plan to attend SpringSim in April in Virginia please let me know. I would appreciate help in presentation.  

  
             Jacob 

  

        
_______________________________________________
PopModWkGrpIMAG-news mailing list
PopModWkGrpIMAG-news at simtk.org
https://simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/popmodwkgrpimag-news


Proclaimer RIVM http://www.rivm.nl/Proclaimer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://simtk.org/pipermail/popmodwkgrpimag-news/attachments/20150220/5935f566/attachment.html