[Population Modeling] Our paper for SpringSim returned from review - we need to act

[Ates Hailegiorgis]

I go with option 1 too.

Ates

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Talitha Feenstra <talitha.feenstra at rivm.nl>
wrote:

> Agree, option 1 seems best and we can shorten our own part.
>
> regards, Talitha
>
> TL Feenstra
>
> -----popmodwkgrpimag-news-bounces at simtk.org schreef: -----
> Aan: Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com>, "
> popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org" <popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org>
> Van: Jonathan Karnon
> Verzonden door: popmodwkgrpimag-news-bounces at simtk.org
> Datum: 02/19/2015 11:18PM
> Onderwerp: Re: [Population Modeling] Our paper for SpringSim returned from
> review - we need to act
>
>
>  Hi Jacob
>
>  Option 1 is good – you could set a word limit for each contributor and
> ask us to edit our section
>
>  Regards
>
>  Jon
>
>   From: Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, 20 February 2015 6:40 am
> To: "popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org" <popmodwkgrpimag-news at simtk.org>
> Subject: [Population Modeling] Our paper for SpringSim returned from
> review - we need to act
>
>   Hi All, yet especially our SpringSim paper authors,
>
>  Those of you that joined the group before 9-Jan may recall that we took
> the correspondence in this group and formed it into a paper that was
> submitted to SpringSim. Here is the paper draft submitted:
>
>
> https://simtk.org/docman/view.php/962/1886/PopModExample_Submit_2015_01_09.doc
>
>  To be clear, if you introduced yourself to the group and sent references
> before 9-Jan and unless you specified otherwise you are an author in the
> paper.
>
>  The Work in Progress (WIP) editor Gregory Zacharewicz has responded to
> our submission. Here are his comments:
>
>  ###### Relevant Response Text #######
>
>  On behalf of the SpringWIP 2015 WIP Program Committee, your paper seems
> promising and can have the potential to appear as Work in Progress at the
> conference:
>
>      Population Modeling by Examples
>
> Nevertheless it does not respect some of the following format constraints:
>
> 1. Title must have the mention "(WIP)"
> 2. Check the paper format according to the author kit
>    http://www.scs.org/documents/2014%20New%20Author%20Kit.zip
> 3. Respect the 6 pages limitation
>
>  ###### End of relevant Response Text #######
>
>  Here are 3 possible actions we can take as a group:
>
>  1. Shorten text of each contributor to be of limited size. This seems
> the default solution and I can take care of it with your permission.
>
>  2. Transfer the last few contributors to a new paper that will be
> submitted to SummerSim with new contributions collected after January 9th.
> We can quickly assemble such a paper to include our new members - we grew
> by 50% since then.
>
>  3. Decide on another publication venue that will allow a longer paper,
> i.e. journal, conference, book, web site, etc. - If you have ideas, please
> suggest.
>
>  At this point, I would like to know what the group thinks. I would ask
> paper contributors to briefly respond to the list before Monday February
> 22.
>
>  Also, if you plan to attend SpringSim in April in Virginia please let me
> know. I would appreciate help in presentation.
>
>               Jacob
>
>
>    _______________________________________________
> PopModWkGrpIMAG-news mailing list
> PopModWkGrpIMAG-news at simtk.org
> https://simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/popmodwkgrpimag-news
>
>
> Proclaimer RIVM http://www.rivm.nl/Proclaimer
> <http://www.rivm.nl/Proclaimer>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PopModWkGrpIMAG-news mailing list
> PopModWkGrpIMAG-news at simtk.org
> https://simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/popmodwkgrpimag-news
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://simtk.org/pipermail/popmodwkgrpimag-news/attachments/20150220/2caaaf1f/attachment.html