[Vp-integration-subgroup] Reminder to vote on white paper Venue - CONTIBUTORS - Please ACT by 4/16

[Jacob Barhak]

Greetings White paper Contributors,

This is your chance to decide on the venue. If you name is on this list,
please take a few minutes anv vote for the venue:
Jonathan Karr
Rahuman Sheriff
James Osborne
Gilberto Gonzalez Parra
Eric Forgoston
Ruth Bowness
Yaling Liu
Robin Thompson
Winston Garira
Marcella Torres
Hana M. Dobrovolny
Tingting Tang
William Waites
James Glazier
James R. Faeder

Currently one vote was cast and unless there will be more votes, the venue
voted for will be chosen. So if you have a strong preference, this is your
chance to influence the publication venue.

You will find eligible venues below as well as additional details.

I look forward to your votes.

               Jacob



On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:04 PM John Rice <john.rice at noboxes.org> wrote:

> No objection to any but will VOTE CUREUS.
>
> My understanding it was created to provide a peer reviewed open source
> indexed journal that could accommodate new forms of papers and new relevant
> topical areas.  Good timing for them lifting the limit on references, so
> assume this paper could be submitted in current form subject only to
> reviewers’ response.
>
> Don’t know that it has a model credibility related topic section yet.
>
> John
>
>
>
> Typed with two thumbs on my iPhone.  (757) 318-0671
>
> “Upon this gifted age, in its dark hour,
> Rains from the sky a meteoric shower
> Of facts . . . they lie unquestioned, uncombined.
> Wisdom enough to leech us of our ill
> Is daily spun; but there exists no loom
> To weave it into fabric.”
>
> –Edna St. Vincent Millay,
>
>
>
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 01:23, Jacob Barhak <jacob.barhak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Greeting White paper contributors,
>
> The old Thread that contained discussions towards creations and approval
> of the white paper have become too long, so I started a new maling thread.
>
> You can find the old discussion thread here:
>
> https://lists.simtk.org/pipermail/vp-reproduce-subgroup/2021-April/000052.html
>
> To summarize, we have reached a point where 17 authors approved the
> following version for submission, pending some minor changes like
> spelling and grammar correction.
>
> To avoid any confusion - here is the paper version we approved is here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IMEgmdNkx-EsnOjGuegpenSIMmKIkK00Lc8Gred3QxM/edit?usp=sharing
>
> At this point we need to select a venue to submit the paper to. Here is a
> short list I collected after incorporating all the suggestions and removed
> all venues that had any objections. To your convenience I added additional
> notes form personal knowledge - I did not look at issues such as
> publication fees for open access - different venues may have different
> rules and may require some additional investment, so please look at the
> venue you are choosing and learn the limitations/benefits before you vote:
>
> Here is the short list:
>
>    1. Cureus - will require cutting out some references due to limitation
>    2. Nature - if you vote for this venue please specify flavour such as
>    Nature Scientific Reports
>    3. Science
>    4. Briefings in Bioinformatics
>    5. Trends in Biotechnology - requires distilling the paper
>    6. Journal of The Royal Society Interface
>    7. Annual Review of Public Health
>    8. BMJ
>    9. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
>    10. F1000research - if you vote for this this venue please
>    specify Gateway / Collection
>    11. iScience
>    12. bulletin of mathematical biology
>    13. Bioinformatics.
>
>
> I ask that each contributor who has a preference among those Journals
> reply to all to this message and pick one venue. Please pick only one
> considering all aspects of the venue. You are welcome to include your
> reasoning, yet vote towards only one venue.  You are welcome to change your
> mind - yet only your last vote will count.
>
> In case of a tie in the number of votes, the venue that got the first
> counted vote will be chosen.
>
> After we select, I will put the work to format the submission towards that
> venue and include all necessary submission matters. In case of fees, those
> who voted for the venue will be responsible for covering publication fees.
>
> At this point I assume no one has any objections to any venues and we are
> all ok with submitting this version - so we are just prioritizing according
> to the majority of wishes while keeping the process transparent and giving
> some incentive to early bird vote.
>
> If any of my assumptions are not correct, please correct me now!
>
> This is the best way I think we can create consensus in such a large group
> - and consensus is legally necessary for publication.
>
> I ask that we limit the voting time to approximately one week. So votes
> should be cast by 1am April 16th CDT.
>
> I will send another reminder during this week, yet I assume one week is
> sufficient to make a simple choice of prefered venue and those not voting
> elect to abstain from choosing and prefer the majority choice.
>
> I look forward to your votes.
>
>             Jacob
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vp-reproduce-subgroup mailing list
> Vp-reproduce-subgroup at lists.simtk.org
> https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-reproduce-subgroup
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.simtk.org/pipermail/vp-integration-subgroup/attachments/20210412/1ff42bf3/attachment.html>