[Vp-integration-subgroup] [Vp-reproduce-subgroup] Shayn Peirce-Cottler via Frontiers: Manuscript

[Jacob Barhak]

Thanks to all contributors who answered,

Most contributors approved by now.

James and Wiliam, I am not sure how many more revisions there will be for
this publication. I did not add several important references of my own in
this revision. Frankly I wanted to keep reference changes to a minimum and
kept it as close as possible to the origin . However, we are transferring
the paper to the publisher under CC license, so it will not be hard to
create another derived version with all sorts of additions and
modifications in the future where people can edit it as they see fit and
add whatever references they want - so after it gets published you can
continue working on other versions as you see fit. For now I ask we focus
on publishing this version alone and I really hope the editors will not put
us through another revision round since it makes no sense at this point -
any change is not substantial compared to what we have already and any
delay is more damaging than productive.

To be productive I ask that the following people who did not answer so far
take the time to APPROVE, DISAPPROVE, or ABSTAIN.:
Robin Thompson
James R. Faeder
Jonathan Karr
Rahuman Sheriff
John Rice

John Rice - thanks for your support, yet you will have to be specific: You
can either choose APPROVE or ABSTAIN - both of these options will move the
paper forwards. APPROVE will add your name to the list of authors with all
responsibilities and privileges listed or implied , ABSTAIN will put you in
acknowledgements without any obligation. So John, please choose if you want
your name on the paper or not in this specific version - any decision you
make will be ok.

I hope we can father all support quickly so I can move forward and submit
the paper.

                      Jacob


On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:46 AM William Waites <wwaites at ieee.org> wrote:

> I’m just chasing down references for use in another context and I notice
> that the Ke et al paper is still a pre-print after more than a year. There
> is no problem in my opinion citing preprints but it is suspect in this
> case: there’s been a ton of work on SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness, why didn’t
> this get published? Probably not best to rely on it as an example of
> practice. Perhaps to fix on revision.
>
> -w
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vp-integration-subgroup mailing list
> Vp-integration-subgroup at lists.simtk.org
> https://lists.simtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vp-integration-subgroup
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.simtk.org/pipermail/vp-integration-subgroup/attachments/20211110/31ed7226/attachment.html>